The blogosphere will be all over this like white on rice: Moore alters "Bowling" DVD in response to criticism
In the original film, Moore added a subtitle to the "Willie Horton" commercial that read "Willie Horton released. Then kills again.". Apparently Michael Moore changed the subtitle to read "Willie Horton released. Then rapes a woman.", consistent with the facts of Horton's case.
The mind-boggling thing for me is not the lies but the stupidity of them. This is like Moore's removal of his predictions of a Republican defeat in the 2002 (the "Payback Tuesday" website).
It's much worse to try to cover up your mistakes than to simply admit that you're wrong. To just change your published work without comment is ... I want to say Orwellian but that doesn't quite fit. It's behaving as badly as the New York Times.
A man could go crazy worrying about stuff like this, but I was reading a brief history of the controversial Abortion pages on Wikipedia, and skimming the pages themselves, when I found this:
Should first-trimester abortions continue to be legal? In the United States, this is tantamount to asking, "Should Roe v. Wade continue to be supported?"
There is a widespread belief that if Roe were overturned, abortion would no longer be legal. Actually, that's not true. Roe is a sufficient condition for legal first-trimester abortion not a necessary one.
If Roe were overturned today, first-trimester abortion would remain legal in every state where it was not explicitly prohibited by existing state law: which is to say, every state where it was legal in 1973, when Roe was decided. That's New York, Alaska, Washington, Hawaii (repealed) and California (invalidated by state supreme court).
Any state whose legislature has bothered to legalize abortion while Roe was in effect (Why, since such a prohibition is a dead letter under Roe? Legislators do the darndest things.) would also continue to have legal abortion if Roe were dropped today. (I know of no state that fits into this category.)
Finally, some states would not enforce and would probably move to repeal the previously dead provisions of their state laws that outlawed abortion. Massachusetts is probably in this category; there would probably be others. But Roe is not the only thing keeping abortion legal in the U.S. -- it's just the only thing keeping abortion legal in Nebraska, or anywhere else it's opposed by the majority of state residents.
Some useful data can be found in the infamous Levitt paper on abortion and crime rates.