I wasn’t really trying to start a conversation with Colby regarding the bombing of Cologne. I was just pissed off and needed to vent. But I did it publicly: that was stupid.
As Colby writes:
[UPDATE, March 2: Sam Mikes takes umbrage with my entry on the flattening of Cologne, though on frankly unclear grounds
I was irritated at his dismissal of C. David Noziglia’s claim (in a letter to Virginia Postrel), that the USAAF deserves credit for the survival of the cathedral. Certainly not all the credit: Colby justly pointed out that the cathedral’s survival of the 1000-bomber raid is no credit to the USAAF. But in subsequent raids when the USAAF was dropping bombs, further damage to the cathedral was minimal even though it lies quite close to several legitimate targets. So the USAAF deserves some credit.
And on losses, six bombers lost in air-to-air combat may not seem like much compared to 41 (according to this page) lost in the 1000-bomber raid. But the figures aren’t directly comparable. The nominal B-17 strength of 3rd Air division was only 520, I don’t know how many planes flew that day, and I only have hearsay figures (reported in 1st Air division’s logs) on air-to-air losses for this day. For the 1000-bomber raid, we know that 41 of 1047 aircraft were lost but not to what cause (RAF has estimates). I haven’t been able to find detailed numbers on daily aircraft losses per missions flown, and I don’t care enough to go to the library over this.
Colby and I probably agree that inaccurate, self-important American grandstanding is unpleasant. Perhaps we disagree on whether this is what Mr. Noziglia was doing. But we probably agree that bombing Cologne is a stupid topic for continued discussion.